July 2024
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

    In today’s digital age, the debate over reading preferences continues to rage on. Do you find yourself firmly in the physical book camp, relishing the feel and smell of paper, or have you embraced the convenience of ebooks and the endless virtual library they offer?

    I’ll go further here and add that from my point of view, I like both physical and electronic books. I appreciate the pros and cons of each format, and I’m sure many of you feel the same.

    **Physical Books:**
    **Pros:**
    Tangibility: The tactile experience of holding a physical book, flipping through its pages, and enjoying the unique smell of paper can be truly enchanting.
    Collectibility: For many, there’s a joy in building a personal library with beautiful physical copies of their favorite books.
    Reduced screen time: Reading a physical book offers a break from screens and reduces eye strain.
    **Cons:**
    Space and weight: Physical books can take up a lot of space, making them less practical for travel or small living spaces.
    Lack of portability: Carrying multiple books can be cumbersome, and you’re limited to the selection you have with you.
    Environmental impact: The production of physical books involves paper, ink, and transportation, which can have ecological consequences.

    **Ebooks:**
    **Pros:**
    Portability: Ebooks are incredibly convenient for those on the go, as you can carry an entire library on a single device.
    Adjustable text: Ebooks often allow you to adjust font size and style, making them accessible for a wider range of readers.
    Search and annotations: Digital books make it easy to search for specific content and add notes or highlights.
    **Cons:**
    Lack of tangibility: Ebooks lack the sensory experience of a physical book, which some readers find less engaging.
    Device dependence: You need a compatible device to read ebooks, and that may require regular recharging or replacement.
    Digital distractions: Reading on a screen can lead to distractions from notifications and other apps, potentially affecting focus.

    **So, what’s your take on the matter? Are you team physical books, team ebooks, or like me, somewhere in between, enjoying the best of both worlds?**

    ​

    by MadMaxine666

    6 Comments

    1. Strongly Team eBook, the one exception being if the book has a lot of colourful pictures or diagrams. The key issues for me are portability and comfort.

    2. ExploringMacabre on

      I like physical books. I like the feel of reading them and the look of them on display.

      BUT, but, I got an E reader for my birthday and have been enjoying it a good deal. I specifically wanted an E reader because I have limited space and limited cash. Even buying used books online often comes with postage and packaging cost. It feels rough if I’m buying a £3 used book and it has £2.80 P&P. Its hard to beat a 99p kindle book.

      So thats my new policy. Buy the E book and If i really like the book I’ll get a physical edition.

    3. There is absolutely NO reason there should even be a debate. Options are great. Technology is great. Tradition is great. We have a choice, we can use what ever we want, when ever we want. No one is wrong.

    4. I read exclusively eBooks on my Kindle and have for years. Under the Dome was what physically pushed me over the edge and made me invest in a Kindle (it was like 400 bucks back then!). That book caused me actual physical pain trying to read it in bed etc!

      But I love physical books and miss reading them dearly. I just cant justify reading a physical book after reading on a kindle for so long.

      But when I read an book that I really truly loved and enjoyed (via my Kindle), I will go and buy a physical copy and place it on my bookshelf 😉

      One of the main selling points for me, is the backlit nature of the Kindle and how perfectly the pages are lit. (I tend to read exclusively in bed when its dark and my wife is sleeping.) Of course all of the other benefits of an e-reader also apply.

      edit: And I’ve brought this up a few times, but a popular trend you see with physical movies (blurays) is the combo packs: bluray, ultra hd 4k, and digital. I would LOOOOOVE if physical books figured out how to get into that space. Buy a physical book and get a code for the eBook version or something.

    5. I exclusively use an e-reader.

      1. Easier to get comfortable while reading.

      2. Easier when moving homes.

      3. Highlighting/looking up unfamiliar words is easier

      4. I can take dozens of books everywhere I go really easily.

      Basically it’s far more convenient. I haven’t bought a physical book in almost half a decade. I don’t have anything against them but e-book4lyfe in this house.

    6. E-readers are designed for novels and similar works. So they work just fine with Pride & Prejudice or a Brief History of Time.

      However, for many reference works, they work poorly because they can’t render graphs/charts/tables very well. Even something like Vogue magazine – which, face it, no one reads for the *articles* – doesn’t work very well in e-book format.

      E-books are better for some forms of search – finding every page where a certain character is mentioned – while they’re worse for the sort of “it’s about 2/3rds of the way through” searches. E-books are also worse for flipping back-and-forth in most cases.

      The device is also an issue. E-paper development has stalled and modern e-paper readers are essentially in the same place they were a decade ago. In theory, you should be able to buy a foldable device with rapid page flips, no eyestrain and incredible battery life. In practice, you’re stuck with last generation technology since no one wants to invest in a device only used for reading.

    Leave A Reply