Typically the thought would be that an author's writing should improve as they write more books and hence later books would be/ more enjoyable for you.
But do you ever find its the opposite? Or perhaps you like their newer books, there's just something you miss a bit from their earlier books?
For example, one author I like used to write shorter books. I liked this simply because the story was more streamlined and it was a breeze to read through. It lacked some depth that could have been added, but it was still really enjoyable.
A different author I like had a first book that had really odd pacing, yet it was also kind of nice. They specifically had three main characters and each chapter was the next main character and this is consistent throughout the entire book.
Both of these authors have later works that I prefer overall, but I sometimes wish for another book like their earlier works.
by 3Nephi11_6-11