Just finished the book. Was looking to see some analysis from other people because, like others, I was feeling a bit empty after finishing it and needed some more deep thought about it. Something I keep coming across in almost every post is that Richard is an unreliable narrator. There were a few times when he was drugged up that I understood this, but for the most part I entirely was relying on him. Completely thought everything he said was truth. I’m wondering why other people were questioning his validity. I actually liked him and I’m seeing some criticism. Really just curious to hear more peoples take on him as a narrator and main character!
by listensslikespring